Kalen Hughes on Georgian and Regency Clothing
Historical Romance author Kalen Hughes wore a day dress from the Regency period and brought in two friends wearing Georgian clothes. Woot! Costumes! Ms. Hughes busted the comfort myth about corsets: in truth they were made to fit, so were very comfortable. It is physically impossible for it to pinch, because there is nothing in the construction that comes together in any way that could pinch or poke. (unless the boning is coming out of its casing.) Georgian and Regency corsets don’t make it impossible to breathe, because the metal grommet was not invented until 1828 and therefore on cannot pull the corset strings tight enough to rearrange ribs (not until Victorian). Corsets are all about creating the right silhouette. The Georgian corset was designed to provide a tube-like body. The Regency corset was all about pushing the boobs up and separating them.
She debunked the Rebel Myth: Ladies did NOT go about without corsets. They would feel naked without them. It would be like a woman now going without a bra – breasts still bounced without support. Women did not feel constrained by their stays because it was an everyday occurrence. Boys & Girls started wearing stays at 6 months. Boys stopped at age 5-8 when they were breeched. Girls continued. Scandalous is girls wearing drawers, which were introduced in the Regency period from France. Not common until Victorian era. Drawers are crotchless to enable urination. They end just below the knee where they button shut
The word “stays” is equivalent to the word “corset”. “Corset” was introduced around 1790 from France, and throughout the Regency the two words were used interchangeably. In the Victorian era only “corset” was used.
Corsets are not uncomfortable, but they do restrict the wearer. The shoulder straps hamper full range of arm motion. A woman cannot raise her arms all the way in a regency corset and cannot bend at the waist. Everything is from the hip. Busks mandate perfect posture. Slouching is impossible. True discomfort can be caused by the shift, which may leave tiny welts that itch when the shift is removed. If a woman loses weight the corset can rub, but if she gains weight it is not a problem, because the lacing can simply be loosened. If the boning works out of its casing it can really jab. Eating in a corset was not a problem until the Victorian era, hense the advent of the 6 hour meal. Women wore stays while pregnant, which had side lacing marked for expansion. There were no pregnancy clothes. Instead things were adapted. Women didn’t not go into confinement till the Victorian era.
Ms. Hughes spoke on Sex and the Corset. At social function it would be quite difficult to remove the corset or stays for a tryst, because it takes 25 minutes to remove. The corset has Spiral lacing, so that it cannot be loosened. The lacing must be completely removed and usually laced up the back, so women could not dress by themselves. Only the Victorian corset had cross lacing that could be popped off.
The shift is worn under corset. It is easily laundered and used to keep the corset clean. The petticoat looks like a pinafore. It ties in back and goes on over the corset. Gives layer between dress and corset. Ms. Hughes told us that there is zero documentation about dampened petticoats, except one letter from a man bitching about debauchery in france. The lower sleeves of a dress could be removable for hot weather. The garters had metal springs.
Hero did not have tight pants: all britches have a big bum so can he can sit down. The shirts have slim sleeves and never buttoned all the way down. (so the stereotypical romance cover with the man in a ripped open shirt wouldn’t have been possible, unless it’s really ripped. The cravat has two removable collars and a cravat pad,


When she first joined RWA in 1985 all but one member was writing contemporary and she had self doubt about if she should be writing historical. She urged her audience not to let others change what you believe you should be doing. Aspiring authors must decide what their motivation is. Is it fame and fortune? Validation for self as artist? Because you can’t NOT write? There is nothing like finding a dream come true to keep ones nose to the keyboard. Too often we think of things so far in the future that we lose track of the steps to get there. It is easy to fail with pie in the sky goals. Aspiring authors should make small achievable goals. An aspiring author is one moving forward on the quest.
My day is packed:

I started off looking for a photo of a Regency kitchen and ended up finding two jolly good quizzes for your Monday Morning entertainment, not to mention this lovely picture of The Romantic Hero paperdoll.
Frustratingly, there seem to be London guidebooks for most other literary genres, but not romance. There are numerous books on London through the eyes of
I am in love. With books. With Romance Novels. With Regency Romance Novels. With Stephanie Laurens and Julia Quinn and Lisa Kleypas and Elizabeth Boyle and OMG I need MORE. How on earth can I take the time to write book reviews when there are so many novels just waiting for me to sink my teeth into? I am completely, hopelessly, utterly addicted to a well-written Regency Romance. I want to go to a ball. I want to ride a horse in Hyde Park. I want to cross verbal swords with witty gentleman rakes and see plays on Drury Lane and stroll through Vauxhall Gardens and tiptoe through the hallowed halls of Whites and dance through Almack’s and READ MORE. Laugh all you want (and I did because these “